It's easy to follow, it's a knee jerk tribalism reaction and not a logical or informed one. Go attracts backend or anti-frontend people so anything intermingling the two will draw out the commenters who bemoan anything that realistically builds a modern website. Just ignore it, your choice for dev tooling is practical and makes sense to me.
It doesn't depend on node for runtime. Only for dev: the vite dev server, and js bundling, nothing else.
Also I've been a long time templ & html/template user, also used templui. gsx is born out of my ergonomics desire from templ. gsxui is similar to templui, but makes bundling possible. Also borrowed pipeline filters from html/template. But you're right, this does involve a _build_ step. But I think it's worth it.
Later I'll add the bundler free version. But really, vite has been so useful. Just treat it as another tool.
GSX seems interesting but I don’t understand why it depends on the node ecosystem. I just want to use Go for everything.
because Vite is great. It only uses it in dev. In prod, no node involved. Try the gsx init. You'll know why. The dev experience you'll want.
EDIT: highlights are:
- live reload: it only reloads after new binary is built. also has /healthz check integration. I believe this is better than air, wgo etc
- dev panel & error overlay: see generate, build status: on syntax error, you get an error overlay explaining where the error is;
- status for slow builds: if you're working in a big project, you can see the building progress & log in the dev overlay
I'm kinda in the camp of wanting nothing to do with node if I'm building in Go. We have our own stdlibs for serving.
I am on the Java/.NET camp for the most part, however I do share the sentiment.
I’m in the other camp. I switched to node backends from go because of vite.
Same, hard pass on remote shell as a service that is Node and its ecosystem.
I'm not sure I follow. Node is not on the production path
It's easy to follow, it's a knee jerk tribalism reaction and not a logical or informed one. Go attracts backend or anti-frontend people so anything intermingling the two will draw out the commenters who bemoan anything that realistically builds a modern website. Just ignore it, your choice for dev tooling is practical and makes sense to me.
Thanks for the explanation. I do find air lacking for sufficiently complicated applications servers
Cool! was looking for go based frontend options for local data heavy dashboard usecase, this seems perfect.
How does this compare to templ and templui? I see from the docs that gsx is templ compatible.
And why does this depend on node / npx? Something to do with the JSX syntax and parsing?
I wish go std templates were more ergonomic for components.
Past that I wish projects like templ or GSX have a simple go generate pipeline, and support html and text/markdown output including whitespace.
Until then I have a Frankenstein of a bunch of templating.
It doesn't depend on node for runtime. Only for dev: the vite dev server, and js bundling, nothing else.
Also I've been a long time templ & html/template user, also used templui. gsx is born out of my ergonomics desire from templ. gsxui is similar to templui, but makes bundling possible. Also borrowed pipeline filters from html/template. But you're right, this does involve a _build_ step. But I think it's worth it.
Later I'll add the bundler free version. But really, vite has been so useful. Just treat it as another tool.
A GSX + Wails combo sounds interesting for developing desktop apps fully in Go
Looks good. I normally package a webui up with vite and serve that but I'll keep this in mind
Yep, exactly, you can also do code splitting by adding multiple entry points. https://github.com/gsxhq/vite does the heavy lifting
does it work with htmx?
Absolutely. I already ported my production app - enterprise customer to it. I use it with https://github.com/jackielii/structpages/